Previous Natural Hazards Research Australia (the Centre) work developed a research data framework to help scope and guide the development of a national data catalogue.
This project seeks to develop a data catalogue that aligns with the Centre's commitment to FAIR and CARE principles through access to research data. The data catalogue will use research data assets of projects funded through the Centre and the previous Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC, which will support all future research and be available to the community.
Frequently asked questions
Q) What are the key features you’re looking for in the Data Catalogue web application?
A) The features are defined in the functional requirements of the RFP.
Q) Are there any specific integrations or platforms that you'd prefer?
A) We are currently using Microsoft-based PaaS and integration within our platform is highly regarded.
Q) Could you clarify which specific elements or sections of the Statement of Requirements are expected to be addressed under the “Approach” criterion in our proposal.
A) The "Approach" criterion considers all sections of the Statement of Requirements and can be considered the 'how' aspects of your response. Particular focal areas of the Statement of Requirements could be considered as:
- Background
- Data Catalogue requirements
Within your response, the following mandatory sections will be considered as part of your "Approach":
- "Project Team",
- "Work Plan", and
- "Statement of Acceptance".
You may add additional sections to those outlined in the RFP as you see fit - in this way the response format is flexible. Any additions which could be considered part of ‘how’ you will do the project will be within scope of your “Approach”.
Q) Do you expect the “Approach” to include a detailed software architecture, integration plan with the Centre’s cloud environment, and methodology for collaboration with the IT Service Management Provider?
Detailed software architecture and integration plans are not explicitly required but may assist in communicating your "Approach". Similarly, outlining a strategy for collaboration with the IT Service Management Provider may also clarify those aspects of your "Approach".
Q) How should we present our understanding of the Centre’s data architecture and the ReDCAT-AU metadata profile—within the “Approach” section or as separate supporting documentation?
A) Your understanding of our Statement of Requirements should be evident in your response - that is part of our “Approach” assessment. The response should contain no more than 10 pages (including appendices or other attachments). Excluding the mandatory sections - the format has been left intentionally flexible. This is opportunity to demonstrate your understanding and communication skills with us.
Q) Is there a preferred format or structure for presenting the “Approach” (e.g. problem definition, solution design, integration, collaboration, risk mitigation)?
A) The format has been left intentionally flexible. This is opportunity to demonstrate your understanding and communication skills with us.
Q) Are you expecting a narrative description, diagrams, or both for the proposed implementation approach, particularly regarding the Data Catalogue API, databases, and user workflows?
A) Within the 10-page limit, submissions can include any combination of text, diagrams, and other forms of communication. The level of detail expected is that of an RFP response.
